Our website publishes news, press releases, opinion and advertorials on various financial organizations, products and services which are commissioned from various Companies, Organizations, PR agencies, Bloggers etc. These commissioned articles are commercial in nature. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. It does not reflect the views or opinion of our website and is not to be considered an endorsement or a recommendation. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third-party websites, affiliate sales networks, and to our advertising partners websites. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish advertised or sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a commercial article placement. We will not be responsible for any loss you may suffer as a result of any omission or inaccuracy on the website.

Home Business Portraying True  Authenticity in Corporate Social Activism
Business

Portraying True  Authenticity in Corporate Social Activism

by wrich
0 comments
Portraying True Authenticity in Corporate Social Activism

Sam Holding, Head of International, SparkPost

Over the past few years we’ve witnessed a striking shift in how brands communicate their identity, values and humanity. While companies traditionally avoid taking a public stance on social and political discourse, it seems that more and more brands are choosing to break this mold. While some chalk up this change to progress, there are countless critics of corporate social activism that argue that brands’ motivations are neither altruistic nor pure. And certainly, when brands are allocating marketing dollars towards promoting a social cause instead of their own product, criticism or at the very least curiosity are warranted. With brands engaging in social issues becoming the norm, it’s time to think critically about how your brand can avoid the pitfalls associated with such a practice. Brands participation in the conversations around COVID-19 as well as the Black Lives Matter movement offer two different scenarios companies can learn from to improve the way they communicate their values to customers. 

Email has a part to play in times of crisis

At the start of the COVID-19 crisis, many companies imbued their customer emails with kind, sentimental language, communicating a message of togetherness during a time of crisis and isolation. Some emails gave customers updates on important information like new business hours or expected shipping delays in light of the pandemic. But, for many brands the emails were purely messages of hope and solidarity. The success of many of these messages was tied directly to the brands’ ability to be authentic.

How to ensure authenticity

An important lesson learned from the start of the COVID-19 crisis is to ask yourself what your motivation is for sending out customer communications regarding a social issue. If the answer to the aforementioned question doesn’t reflect the authenticity of your brand you should consider holding off on sending that message. Customers are becoming more acutely aware of brands that leverage progressive issues to make money. So be sure to always take a step back and reflect on your message before hitting send. If your intention isn’t authentic, you can be certain that your customers will be able to tell.

In late May and early June, brands used email programs and other marketing channels to communicate their support of the Black Lives Matter movement. Brands participated in this critical moment in history by sending customers messages that called for an end to systemic racism and outlined steps they would be taking to elevate BIPOC in the workplace and beyond. These messages sparked conversations around the appropriateness of brands’ involvement in social movements as well as the pitfalls of virtue signaling, making a public statement to perform “goodness” without taking action. If you’re planning to send a message or create a campaign in regards to a social movement take a step back and think about what your company does internally to support the social movement in question. If the answer is “not a whole lot” then it’s imperative that you pump the breaks on external messaging. Brands that focus only on their external presence without creating change from the inside out are seen as hypocritical by consumers. Simply put, if your company cannot walk the walk, they shouldn’t put out a statement that talks the talk. If there is no action plan or proof to support your external statement ask yourself why that is instead of joining a conversation your organization may not be able to add to in a meaningful way.

True authenticity will always be key

In 2020 countless brands, both large and small, expressed their opinions on social issues publicly. As these unprecedented times continue to unfold it’s time to think critically about how your brand will engage in critical conversations in the future. More than that, think about what meaningful changes your organization can make so that when the time comes to share those values publicly they are based in action rather than good intentions. As brands continue to participate in corporate social activism, one thing is true, authenticity will always be key.

You Might Be Interested In